Acts: For the Cause of Christ – Sermon #2

For the Cause of ChristActs: For the Cause of Christ – Sermon #2

Acts 1:12-26 – Waiting and Working

Prayer: “Let it be my life’s refrain: To live is Christ, to die is gain; deny myself, take up my cross and follow the Son”

Intro:

Last time we finished by staring after Jesus ascending into heaven being told by a couple of angels, that He would return to that spot in the same way He left. Christ had told the Eleven Apostles that they were to wait for the coming of the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem and then to begin witnessing in Jerusalem, then reaching out to ends of the world. So, we pick up this week continuing in chapter 1 with them doing just that, waiting…and then doing some work.

1. Waiting vv 12-15

Luke picks up right after the angels tell the Eleven that Christ would return in the same way He had just left, with “they returned to Jerusalem”. Then Luke gives one of the little details that we will see throughout the book. He tells us that the Mount of Olives is “about a Sabbath day’s journey” away from Jerusalem. So what does that mean, well here Luke is just giving us distance. Interpreting of the Law, people could travel about 2000 cubits (which was the distance of pastureland for the Levites had around the cities of refuge) 2000 cubits is roughly 1 kilometer. Now if your like me and not up on your kilometer to mile formulas, I already looked it up. 1 kilometer is just over half a mile.

So here in verse 13 we see that the Apostles went back to Jerusalem and then back to the upper room. This upper room is where they have been staying, one source called it their “base of operations” or headquarters in Jerusalem. We are not sure where exactly this room was. It is possible it was the same upper room in which they had the Last Supper with Christ, where He inaugurated the Lord’s Table and Judas had left to betray Christ; or whether it was the upper level of a large house of another follower of Jesus’.  Here Luke gives roll call. He lists the Eleven Apostles, partly I think because Luke hadn’t yet named these men in this volume, and, I think, because it sets up the rest of the chapter. Luke goes through the list of names, this list is almost identical to the one in Luke 6:14-16, when Christ had chosen them roughly three years before, the only differences are a few variations of name order (on source specifically mentions how John is listed before his brother James here), and that Judas Iscariot is no longer listed. An interesting item to note is that from here on, only Peter, John, and James are ever mentioned again in the New Testament.

Verse 14 starts by telling us what the Apostles were doing. They were praying. I think it is safe to say that they were worshipping God and that it is even possible that they had gone to the Temple for regular service. But, they did it unified. Some translations say, “they were in one accord”. But you didn’t know that Honda was building cars in the first century now did you? The Apostles were unified in their prayer and worship together. They were unified in their prayer and waiting together. Remember, they are still waiting for the Holy Spirit to come, but we see that they weren’t alone.

Verse 14 continues with listing who is there in the upper room with the Eleven. “The women”, this is a reference back to godly women who had followed Christ from Galilee (Luke 23:55), this group contained Mary the mother of Jesus. We should note that, first, this is the last specific mention of Mary in the New Testament, second we see that she is worshipping along with the Apostles. No one there was praying to Mary or kneeling before her. What does that tell us? That tells us that she is in no way central to the gospel message. She was a faithful and good servant of God for what she was called to do, but to ascribe to her more than what Scripture records is wrong.

We also that Jesus’ brothers are listed here. Now there is some debate whether the term means brother in the normal or natural sense or does it mean “other relatives”, something like cousins. The burden of proof for any other meaning is on those promoting the different meaning. From my study I found that many of the old arguments for this was to promote what the Roman Church calls the “perpetual virginity of Mary”, meaning that Mary had no other children after Jesus and some would go as far as including Joseph in that position as well. This is another example of going to far in ascribing aspects to Mary that aren’t there. I believe that the meaning here is Jesus’ half-brothers. The other children of Mary by Joseph. There’s an old saying, “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense, lest it result in nonsense.” Up until this point Jesus brothers were unbelievers (John 7:3-5). This probably changed after Christ’s resurrection. We are told in 1 Cor 15:7 that Jesus appeared at least to His half-brother James, who would take on a role of leadership in the Jerusalem Church later on (12:17; 15:13-21; 21:18). It seems that Christ’s brothers would remain a distinct group in the early church as Paul grouped them together in 1 Cor 9:5. The beginning of of verse 15 tells us that there were about 120 people in the upper room, this is probably not all the disciples though; remember 1 Cor 15:6 tells us that Christ appeared to over 500 disciples before His ascension. So where are the rest of them? One source suggests that many of them are still in Galilee. Wherever they are, only 120 were here in the upper room in Jerusalem. I’m sure that the Eleven had told the others what happened on the Mount of Olives, what Christ had told them, how He ascended and what the Angels told them. These 120 people were unified in their prayer and worship while they were waiting.

They were waiting. They were obeying. They were praying and worshipping together. Four years ago I was tired of waiting. I started sending out my resume to churches, I had used the college (FBBC) and the GARBC resources to get my resume out. These resources are there for that purpose. We were contacted by a church in upstate New York, we went out and loved the people, the church, the area. But I wasn’t obeying. We had many difficulties getting out there, delayed flight, missed connecting flight and having to stay overnight in Chicago. The church didn’t call us. Looking back, I can see that the Lord was shutting the door, but I was trying to force it open. That lesson hurt. But now after another four years of waiting the Lord opened the door.  What are you waiting for? Are you waiting in obedience? Are you waiting with prayer and worship?

2. Working vv15-26

Even though they were waiting, they saw the need to do some work. We see here in the second half of verse 15 that Peter is again stepping into a leadership role. There doesn’t seem to be any concern or issue of his denial of the Lord before His crucifixion. It appears that everyone has accepted the Peter’s restoration by the Lord has put that in the past. Peter stands up in a position of leadership and verse 16 we see that he is getting down to business to replace Judas, so the Apostles would be back to twelve.

This seems like it would be a big deal, but Peter is going to quote passages from the Psalms to establish that the replacement of Judas was prophesied by David. He doesn’t want to name anybody an Apostle as he lays out qualifications in verses 21 and 22, but we’ll get there. It should be noted that Luke only refers to the Twelve as Apostles, except in 14:4,14. In these verses I think Luke is the more general meaning of apostolos, which is messenger. While I hold to Apostleship of Paul, I don’t think Luke was naming Barnabas as an Apostle in the sense we think about the Twelve or Paul. I think it is possible that he may have been using the term “messenger” since “missionary” wasn’t a term in the First Century.

Verses 18-19 Luke interrupts Peter’s speech and inserts some information. Basically you could draw parentheses marks around verses 18 and 19. What Luke is doing is just giving some background to his readers, since Peter wouldn’t have had to recount what happened with Judas. There is a slight variation between the account given here and in Matthew 27. In Matthew 27 we are told that the Chief priests bought the field. Probaby what happened was that the priests bought the land in Judas’ name. Matthew calls the field “Blood Field” because the land was purchased with blood money, while Luke calls it the “Field of Blood” because Judas’ corpse burst open on the field. Either way, the name is fitting. It is possible that the chief priests bought the field where Judas hanged himself and then turned the field into a cemetary for foreigners.

In verse 20 Luke picks back up with Peter’s speech. Here Peter uses two passages from Psalms as a prophetic basis to replace Judas’ position within the Apostles. The first passage is Psalm 69:25 which is used to show that Judas had been removed and the vacancy was created, then he uses Psalm 109:8 to show that a replacement is needed. We should note that Judas’ death is not what required his replacement. Nobody sought to replace James, the brother of John, after he was executed for the cause of Christ in Acts chapter 12. Judas’ death was only added to the fact that he had defected to and betrayed Christ to His enemies.

Verses 21 and 22 Peter lays out qualifications needed to fill the vacancy. I think that the Peter and the rest of the Eleven had been discussing this amongst themselves for awhile. But the qualifications given are: 1. The man had to be a follower of Jesus since John’s baptism (essentially from the beginning of Jesus’ earthly ministry), and 2. the man had to have seen Jesus after His resurrection. Whether the reference to John’s baptism is a reference to Jesus being baptized by John or the time period of John’s ministry is unknown. But the man should have been a committed follower from the beginning of Jesus ministry although through to His ascension.

In verse 23 we are given the two men’s names. (we’re going to call the first one Joseph). Neither Joseph or Matthias are mentioned in any of the Gospel accounts. It is possible that these were the only two in that 120 that met the qualifications. In verses 24 and 25 we see the prayer of the Apostles. We don’t know exactly who did the praying, it is likely that if Peter was leading the procedure he prayed over the choice here. It is very likely that the group felt that the Lord already had a man chosen, so they prayed for clarity and guidance that they might recognize and call the right man. They didn’t want to choose the wrong man. Then after the prayer the cast lots to determine God’s will of which of these men would be chosen. Casting lots was a common Old Testament way of determining God’s will. This was not out of the ordinary. This was not voting. Casting lots was used in Israel for centuries. It was used to choose which goat was to be the scapegoat for the Day Atonement (Lev 16). The lots indicated Matthias and he was added to the Eleven. I should mention that after the Holy Spirit descends, there are no more examples of casting lots by the church in the New Testament.

It has been said that Peter and the others acted rashly and incorrectly, that the lots showed some lack of faith or reliance upon the Holy Spirit. That Paul was to be the one to take Judas’ place and the Lord would bring him in at the right time. If that is the case then: 1. Why doesn’t Scripture condemn the Matthias or the action taken here in the upper room? 2. If this was wrong, then Peter misused and misinterpreted Old Testament passages. That calls into doubt everything Peter does in Acts and his use of Old Testament Scripture in his epistles. And 3. Paul was unique and had a separate ministry from the Twelve and didn’t counted himself in that group (1 Cor 15:5, 8) and Paul doesn’t fit the qualifications listed in verses 21 and 22. I believe the Apostles and the others acted correctly. I also believe that Paul is an Apostle, though he would have distinct and separate ministry from the Twelve. Peter and the others did things orderly and with prayer. John Bunyan, the author of Pilgrim’s Progress once said, “You can do more than pray after you have prayed, but you cannot do more than pray until you have prayed.”

Is there some work the Lord is leading you to do? Is there some work you have been praying over?

Closing:

We saw how the Apostles and the others waited, with prayer, worship, and obedience. We saw how they handled work that needed to be done, with prayer, by Scripture, and orderly. We should always follow this example of periods of waiting we will face and the decisions we may have to face. Let me close with a quote.

Elizabeth Elliot wrote in her book Shadow of the ALmighty,

“William R. Newell says kneeling is a good way to pray because it is uncomfortable. Daniel prayed on his knees. Jim Elliot said, ‘God is still on His throne, we’re still His footstool, and there’s only a knee’s distance between!’ He also said, ‘That saint who advances on his knees never retreats.’”


This sermon was originally preached at First Baptist Church of Brownsdale, Minn on July 29, 2018.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.